Question 1 of 8 · Law of Torts
Questionmedium
This question was previously asked in

MAH LLB 3 Year CET 1 April Shift 2 2026

Read the passage and answer the question.Vicarious Liability is a legal principle where one person is held liable for the tort committed by another. This typically occurs in a "Master-Servant" relationship. For the Master to be held liable, two conditions must be met: (1) There must be a formal master-servant relationship, and (2) The tortious act must be committed by the servant "in the course of employment."An act is considered within the "course of employment" if it is either a wrongful act authorised by the master, or a wrongful and unauthorised mode of doing some act authorised by the master. However, if a servant performs an act that is totally unconnected to their job (a "frolic of their own"), the master is not liable. Furthermore, an independent contractor is different from a servant; a master is generally not liable for the torts of an independent contractor because the master lacks the right to control how the work is done.A, a truck driver employed by B, was instructed to deliver goods to a warehouse. While driving, A took a short detour to buy a gift for his wife and hit a pedestrian. Is B liable?

Answer View answer ▾

Answer: Option B — Yes, because the detour was a minor deviation and A was still on duty.

Detailed Solution

1

Test from the passage: B is liable if A (his servant) committed the tort in the course of employment, i.e. while doing authorised work, even in an unauthorised way.

2

A was still on his delivery run, driving B's goods; the short detour is only a slight departure from the authorised journey, not a separate 'frolic of his own'.

3

So the act stays within the course of employment and B is vicariously liable.

⚠ Common trap

(A) No, because buying a gift is not a part of A's job treats a minor detour as a frolic; a frolic needs a journey totally unconnected to the job, and A was mid-delivery.

⚠ Common trap

(D) No, because A disobeyed instructions forgets that an unauthorised mode of doing an authorised act still makes the master liable.

Quick tip

Small detour during the authorised job = still in course of employment; a wholly separate personal trip = frolic of his own.

💬 Discussions on this question

Ask a doubt ›

Still stuck on this question? Ask our faculty and fellow students — answers appear here.

Ask a doubt

More Law of Torts Questions

View all ›
  1. Q1.A school hires a private bus company to transport students. The bus driver, employed by the bus company, drives negligently and injures a student. Who is vicariously liable?
  2. Q2.X, a bank security guard, is strictly forbidden from handling cash. One day, to help a busy teller, X takes cash from a customer to deposit it but steals it instead. Is the bank liable?
  3. Q3.Which of the following is the most essential element to establish a Master-Servant relationship?
  4. Q4.In which scenario is the Master NOT liable for the Servant's act?
  5. Q5.Legal Principle: A person who enters another's property without permission commits trespass. Facts: R enters S's farmland without consent to take a shortcut. Question: Who is liable based on the principle?

More Legal Aptitude Questions

  1. Q1.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:Important Legal Terms
  2. Q2.Choose the correct option on the basis of the principle and fact stated below.Legal Maxims
  3. Q3.In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below.Landmark Judgments
  4. Q4.Which Amendment added the words "Socialist" and "Secular" to the Preamble?Constitutional Law
  5. Q5.What does "Reasonable restrictions" mean?Fundamental Rights, DPSP and Writs

Law of Torts — Preparation

This question tests your understanding of Law of Torts, a key topic in the Legal Aptitude section. The detailed solution above uses a step-by-step approach to show the reasoning, and where available, a shortcut that helps you solve similar questions in under 90 seconds during the actual exam.

Law of Torts is part of the Legal Aptitude & Legal Reasoning section of MAH LAW CET (32 questions in the 5-year LLB paper, 24 in the 3-year paper). Topics: General defences, vicarious liability, strict and absolute liability, torts in relation to persons and nuisance. Practise Law CET-level MCQs with step-by-step explanations.