MAH LAW CET
Legal Reasoning Questions with Solutions
3 questions1 easy2 medium
Legal Reasoning is part of the Legal Aptitude & Legal Reasoning section of MAH LAW CET (32 questions in the 5-year LLB paper, 24 in the 3-year paper). Topics: Applying a given legal principle to a set of facts — the main question type in the Law CET legal section, with principles extracted from previous years' papers. Practise Law CET-level MCQs with step-by-step explanations.
- Q1.
Choose the best option as per the legal principle given above:
A. This clearly interferes with the administration of justice, besides causing prejudice to the petitioner.B. Naman Arora is liable as he defamed the celebrity without having any jurisdiction.C. Naman Arora is not liable because he has not passed any judgment; merely pointing out a possible outcome is his duty as a news anchor.D. Naman Arora is liable as he leaked information that was supposed to be kept confidential.mediumAsked in MAH LLB 3 Year CET 2026View solution › - Q2.
Decide: Can Mr. Sinha be sued for defamation?
A. He is liable to be sued for defamation if his statement was not true or was said with a mala fide intention.B. He is not liable because he has just expressed his personal views.C. He cannot be sued, because both are writers and novelists and both can criticize each other.D. He cannot be liable because he has a Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression.mediumAsked in MAH LLB 3 Year CET 2026View solution › - Q3.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below.
A. Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).B. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is NOT the correct explanation of (A).C. (A) is true but (R) is false.D. (A) is false but (R) is true.easyAsked in MAH LLB 3 Year CET 1 April Shift 2 2026View solution ›