MAH LLB 3 Year CET 2026 (1 April Shift 1)
Read the information given below carefully and choose the correct option:Statement:Article 32 gives the Right to move the Supreme Court for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. A new Parliamentary law restricts this right.ConclusionsI.The law may be unconstitutional as Parliament cannot restrict Article 32.II.Article 32 is itself a Fundamental Right.
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)View answer ▾Hide ▴
Answer: Option C — Both conclusion I and II follow
Detailed Solution
Article 32(1) guarantees the right to approach the Supreme Court and sits in Part III, so II follows; Ambedkar called it the 'heart and soul' of the Constitution.
Article 13(2) voids laws abridging Fundamental Rights, and Article 32(4) says the right shall not be suspended except as the Constitution provides, so the law may be unconstitutional: I follows.
⚠ Common trap
Option B stops at II, missing that an ordinary law cannot cut down a Part III right.Quick tip
Remember: Art 32 = itself a Fundamental Right ('heart and soul'); suspended only under Art 359.
💬 Discussions on this question
Ask a doubt ›Still stuck on this question? Ask our faculty and fellow students — answers appear here.
Ask a doubtMore Fundamental Rights, DPSP and Writs Questions
View all ›- Q1.What does "Reasonable restrictions" mean?
- Q2.From which constitution has the feature of Directive Principles been adopted by the framers of the Indian Constitution?
- Q3.Article 39 and 39 A of the Constitution are _______ principles.
- Q4.Village Panchayats are part of _______ principles as per the Indian Constitution.
- Q5.Article 44 of the Liberal-intellectual principles sheds light on _______ perspective.
More Legal Aptitude Questions
- Q1.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:Important Legal Terms
- Q2.Choose the correct option on the basis of the principle and fact stated below.Legal Maxims
- Q3.In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below.Landmark Judgments
- Q4.Which Amendment added the words "Socialist" and "Secular" to the Preamble?Constitutional Law
Fundamental Rights, DPSP and Writs — Preparation
This question tests your understanding of Fundamental Rights, DPSP and Writs, a key topic in the Legal Aptitude section. The detailed solution above uses a step-by-step approach to show the reasoning, and where available, a shortcut that helps you solve similar questions in under 90 seconds during the actual exam.
Fundamental Rights, DPSP and Writs is part of the Legal Aptitude & Legal Reasoning section of MAH LAW CET (32 questions in the 5-year LLB paper, 24 in the 3-year paper). Topics: Articles 12–35, equality, freedoms, protection of life and liberty, writs, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties with key cases. Practise Law CET-level MCQs with step-by-step explanations.